WEBVTT
00:00:00.220 --> 00:00:02.104
Hi, welcome to the poultry keepers podcast.
00:00:02.104 --> 00:00:11.872
I'm john gunterman and, together with mandolin royal and rips talby, where your co-hosts for the show and is our mission to help you have a happy, healthy and productive flock.
00:00:22.140 --> 00:00:25.129
We're gonna be talking about dual purpose poultry today.
00:00:25.129 --> 00:00:28.083
What does dual purpose poultry truly mean?
00:00:28.083 --> 00:00:37.176
Well, coming up, we're going to explore that concept of dual purpose poultry breeds and if you think about it, it can have more than one meaning.
00:00:37.176 --> 00:00:39.723
So let's get started with.
00:00:39.723 --> 00:00:41.027
John will pick on you first.
00:00:41.027 --> 00:00:44.033
What's your definition of a dual purpose poultry breed?
00:00:45.222 --> 00:00:49.601
One that is going to be useful for both Eggs and meat.
00:00:49.601 --> 00:00:51.726
It's about as simple as I can make it.
00:00:51.726 --> 00:00:53.612
Okay, mandolin, what's yours?
00:00:54.521 --> 00:00:55.524
Well for our flock.
00:00:55.524 --> 00:01:03.945
I'm a big fan of the eggs and the meat, but there can be more than just those two purposes and some of the other options that there are.
00:01:03.945 --> 00:01:06.871
You can have ornamental birds that lay really well.
00:01:06.871 --> 00:01:16.353
You can have Birds that you can breed forward yourself, which will be the pure breads rather than hybrids, and that in itself is its own purpose.
00:01:16.353 --> 00:01:25.034
So it's not just the meat nags, but at least two purposes would make them dual purpose, at least to me.
00:01:25.959 --> 00:01:28.703
And you're all about the show well, not really.
00:01:29.305 --> 00:01:41.712
I will confess that I used to be a show guy, but in the last fifteen or so years I began to see what was happening to a lot of our standard bread breeds.
00:01:41.712 --> 00:01:44.887
They were being bred for showroom only.
00:01:44.887 --> 00:01:54.686
There was no consideration given To me, qualities or a quality, and I, you know, I thought this is really sad.
00:01:54.686 --> 00:01:56.067
We need to do something about this.
00:01:56.067 --> 00:02:01.882
But I'm on the bandwagon of this whole dual purpose concept, like mandolin and like you, john it's.
00:02:01.882 --> 00:02:07.650
If we're going to have birds, they need to not only look good but they need to produce good.
00:02:07.650 --> 00:02:11.215
Now, whether that's meat or whether that's eggs, so be it.
00:02:11.215 --> 00:02:17.353
But yeah, bird dual purpose breeds can serve more than one purpose, like mandolin says.
00:02:18.420 --> 00:02:21.705
Something I noticed in the standard of perfection getting ready for this episode.
00:02:21.705 --> 00:02:28.521
I wanted to pull it out cuz I never recalled seeing an egg count In the breed standards.
00:02:28.521 --> 00:02:31.286
I looked up shanticle and I've got a cockerel and a hen.
00:02:31.286 --> 00:02:38.915
Wait, and you know all that data, but it doesn't tell me that you know my bird should be a two fifty to two seventy five year layer.
00:02:39.881 --> 00:02:45.813
No, and it's always been that way in the standard john, from the time it was first written, back in the eighteen seventies.
00:02:47.661 --> 00:02:55.526
Well, I think a lot of this points to the first Section of the sop where talks about production qualities.
00:02:55.526 --> 00:02:57.810
That that's always been kind of.
00:02:57.810 --> 00:03:03.064
A gap in my knowledge is what should I be shooting for for eggs per year out of?
00:03:03.064 --> 00:03:09.681
My shanta claire tells me very clearly my size ranges and what the body should look like and what the fleshing should be like and All that.
00:03:09.681 --> 00:03:17.453
But you know, other than conversing with other shanta claire breeders and saying, hey, what are your egg sizes and what it's your weekly and yearly production?
00:03:17.453 --> 00:03:19.094
That's pretty much all I have to go by.
00:03:20.300 --> 00:03:20.921
I agree with you.
00:03:20.921 --> 00:03:25.449
There's some historical references for some breeds, like rood island reds.
00:03:25.449 --> 00:03:31.042
For example, back in the twenties and thirties there were some rood island reds that were hitting Three hundred eggs.
00:03:31.042 --> 00:03:36.389
They were record breakers, but they were also kind of pretty much the exception to the rule.
00:03:36.389 --> 00:03:41.216
But it shows the potential for what some of these breeds can do.
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:46.006
Well, that potential is what you can breed for.
00:03:46.006 --> 00:04:01.495
So if you've got a flock of twenty five females and you monitor their rate of lay and then you monitor that for their first season of laying, then you can select out the ones who are your strongest layers and those are the ones that you hatch from.
00:04:01.495 --> 00:04:09.633
If you're hatching from your poor layers, you're just gonna get more poor layers, unless the mail brought some improvement in that regard.
00:04:09.633 --> 00:04:15.409
But each generation you still have to go through those girls and figure out who your strongest layers are.
00:04:15.409 --> 00:04:32.271
If you are looking to improve that and I don't worry too much about what other flocks are doing or what the breed is supposed to do, but I'm only looking at Our own flock and what they're doing and selecting off of that, because some flocks aren't gonna have that laying trade in there strongly.
00:04:32.271 --> 00:04:33.694
But you can certainly improve it.
00:04:34.596 --> 00:04:47.302
Oh sure, you know an old poultry breeder who had One of the largest commercial white legged and hatcheries in the country, monroe Babcock, and he told me one time.
00:04:47.302 --> 00:04:57.064
He said, if you really want to improve your birds rate of lay with out Trap nesting, he said just don't send any eggs.
00:04:57.064 --> 00:04:58.889
They're laid after 10 o'clock in the morning.
00:04:58.889 --> 00:05:03.279
He said your better layers Are gonna be laid before 10.
00:05:03.279 --> 00:05:07.067
They come off that roost, they eat a bite and they get right down to business.
00:05:07.067 --> 00:05:12.627
They lay an egg and then they're off and out and ranging around doing chickening things as Mandolin.
00:05:14.076 --> 00:05:17.887
Yeah, that was a big topic, a conversation in the last podcast episodes.
00:05:17.887 --> 00:05:25.389
They do, so let's touch briefly on the difference.
00:05:25.389 --> 00:05:35.187
I hear the terms heritage and and Standard and dual purpose thrown around, but I believe there is a distinct difference between some of these terms.
00:05:36.196 --> 00:05:38.723
There is, for example, mandolin.
00:05:38.723 --> 00:05:44.180
I've got a question for you and John Does the term heritage poultry mean to you guys?
00:05:44.560 --> 00:05:49.069
to me, it means that it's a older, well-established, purebred bird.
00:05:49.069 --> 00:05:53.795
It doesn't imply anything about what they're for or what they look like.
00:05:53.795 --> 00:05:57.444
It's just age of the breed and how long it's been running.
00:05:57.444 --> 00:05:59.228
That's what heritage to me means.
00:06:00.076 --> 00:06:00.336
John.
00:06:01.358 --> 00:06:27.968
I would go with that with the caveat that heritage has also come to mean a certain level of care and handling and Transition between the generations, so to speak, where a breeders you know been breeding for a while and getting ready to retire and will help start somebody else up and they're continuing the heritage of that line or breed.
00:06:28.975 --> 00:06:41.608
We get a little esoteric there, but I think that I think that's a huge part of it, because you can't expect to take, you know, a bunch of chicks from some random person and have them instantly work for you in your environment.
00:06:41.608 --> 00:06:48.574
So having that connection Really helps, and that's usually a regional thing.
00:06:48.574 --> 00:06:52.735
I mean, you'll notice that certain birds just seem to be grown in certain areas.
00:06:52.735 --> 00:06:57.226
There's breeds named after states, so you know, there's a, there's a lot of credence there, I believe.
00:06:58.175 --> 00:07:07.141
There's a lot of implication about the term heritage and it's used like it's been around Since almost day one.
00:07:07.141 --> 00:07:11.704
Okay, when do you think the term heritage poultry wasn't was coined?
00:07:12.567 --> 00:07:14.754
I think I want to blame Joel salad.
00:07:14.754 --> 00:07:16.497
Erg, thank Joel Salatin.
00:07:16.497 --> 00:07:21.127
I think he was part of, I think he was part of that resurgence, but it I don't know.
00:07:21.975 --> 00:07:23.800
Madeline, you want to take a shot at it.
00:07:23.800 --> 00:07:26.485
There's a specific year when it came into being.
00:07:26.807 --> 00:07:28.278
Oh gosh, I don't know.
00:07:28.278 --> 00:07:35.420
But if I had to guess maybe I don't even know what to guess Just tell me I said 1952.
00:07:35.622 --> 00:07:37.747
I believe 1952 for everything.
00:07:38.576 --> 00:07:40.362
The year 2000 that recent.
00:07:40.863 --> 00:07:50.165
I was born between the early 1900s and maybe Around the 50s or 60s, after the commercial stuff hit the scene.
00:07:50.185 --> 00:08:06.819
I didn't know it was that recent very recent, when the reason that it came about and and the livestock conservancy Was the people that brought it about as a way to market old poultry breeds.
00:08:06.819 --> 00:08:09.223
There was a back about.
00:08:09.223 --> 00:08:23.297
Then, you know, there was this huge influx of heirloom seeds Pass along, seeds, heritage, this heritage that well, they just jumped on the bandwagon and coined heritage all fits great.
00:08:23.497 --> 00:08:28.966
So Thanks for that because it's really it's helped.
00:08:28.966 --> 00:08:38.254
You know they, they the timing and the naming and everything I think was so perfect when the livestock conservancy started with the, the buckeye restoration project.
00:08:38.254 --> 00:08:47.539
I mean, I think it was a perfect confluence and you know that the community was ready for this restoration, hungry for that knowledge.
00:08:48.595 --> 00:08:59.667
And I'm not convinced that using the term standard bread poultry really highlights on the heritage, because some of these breeds are they're hundreds of years old.
00:09:00.635 --> 00:09:02.360
And some of them are just well.
00:09:02.360 --> 00:09:04.086
What's the newest breed in the standard?
00:09:04.936 --> 00:09:05.759
I hope rip knows.
00:09:06.995 --> 00:09:12.958
I was just going to share an example with you and where the term heritage has not helped.
00:09:12.958 --> 00:09:22.450
Okay, the the way that the term heritage is defined is that it's a breed that was in the existence prior to 1950.
00:09:22.450 --> 00:09:25.360
Okay, or not in existence.
00:09:25.360 --> 00:09:31.408
It was a breed that was recognized by the american poultry association prior to 1950.
00:09:31.408 --> 00:09:37.423
That covered, at that point, pretty much all the breeds in the apa standard of perfection.
00:09:37.423 --> 00:09:41.739
But we've had other breeds come along, morons, for example.
00:09:41.739 --> 00:09:56.298
That breed has been in existence well before 1950, but it's not been recognized by the apa until just about 15 years ago.
00:09:56.298 --> 00:10:02.355
So it doesn't qualify to use the term heritage poultry, which I think is an absolute, crying shame.
00:10:02.475 --> 00:10:08.542
I think so too, because it goes way back into france hundreds of years hundreds of years.
00:10:09.355 --> 00:10:11.061
And there's other breeds too that have come over.
00:10:11.061 --> 00:10:20.164
You know leg bars, and, and you know we could go on and on and on, but they could legally never use the term heritage poultry.
00:10:21.115 --> 00:10:24.979
No, it's controlled like that, like trademark or.
00:10:26.075 --> 00:10:26.456
USDA.
00:10:26.456 --> 00:10:28.879
Geez thanks.
00:10:29.894 --> 00:10:31.380
I don't know how I feel about that.
00:10:32.176 --> 00:10:34.804
Now that's kind of like going to get an antique tag for your car.
00:10:34.804 --> 00:10:36.462
You know it used to be.
00:10:36.462 --> 00:10:43.008
If your car was 25 years old, they gave you an antique tag and you can only drive it on Sundays or for parades or for mechanical purposes.
00:10:43.008 --> 00:10:45.178
But you know there was some.
00:10:45.178 --> 00:10:49.681
You got some special privileges, like a reduced rate of registration.
00:10:49.955 --> 00:10:52.464
We're gonna start going into a completely different conversation.
00:10:52.464 --> 00:10:55.381
I know, I know, but what?
00:10:55.461 --> 00:11:00.174
is an antique, so that that's our frame of reference at least.
00:11:01.057 --> 00:11:17.519
Well, let's talk a bit about how the standard, the written breed standard, bills the bird and there's some common terms like widths, depths, links, fleshing that aren't tightly defined.
00:11:17.519 --> 00:11:25.115
Okay, and so the best advice I can give to folks is it's relative to the breed you're working on.
00:11:25.115 --> 00:11:29.615
Don't compare your breed to another breed.
00:11:29.615 --> 00:11:33.134
For example, madeleine breeds breast.
00:11:33.134 --> 00:11:38.423
Okay, madeleine, what does the standard car for in the breast back the width?
00:11:39.245 --> 00:11:46.750
They want broad and broad is going to be subjective and they want a long back.
00:11:46.971 --> 00:12:01.923
And that length is going to be subjective because when they start throwing around those terms, to me it means that you're comparing the birds to each other and looking for who's meeting that definition.
00:12:01.923 --> 00:12:31.304
And it's not so much about getting the absolute longest and the absolute widest and broadest birds, because you still have to maintain balance, because if you see one that's got a long back, but then you take a couple steps back and really look at that bird, if that length shows Like as the strongest feature, then it's too long, like you have to maintain balance and perspective when you're looking at what those terms could mean for the bird that's in front of you.
00:12:32.027 --> 00:12:34.572
All the other parts of a bird have got to work in harmony.
00:12:34.933 --> 00:12:36.418
Well, we're always talking about balance.
00:12:37.147 --> 00:12:40.764
So, you're still drawing the line straight up from the legs, and are we balanced?
00:12:40.884 --> 00:12:44.399
And then, if that works, all the other pieces just seem to fit.
00:12:44.399 --> 00:12:50.197
Yeah, so when you've got that, when something's off something's wonky and you go something's off here.
00:12:51.086 --> 00:13:02.158
You know, if we were to, and using breast as an example, if we were to compare back width on breast to the back width on legger.
00:13:03.129 --> 00:13:04.523
That'd be so different, oh.
00:13:05.265 --> 00:13:17.908
Yeah, but they're basically described the same way, but they don't look the same way other amongst their flock exactly can't compare one breed Standard to another breed.
00:13:18.708 --> 00:13:23.258
Even if the words cross over the, the basic mechanics are going to be different.
00:13:23.278 --> 00:13:33.323
It's a different Exactly right, and here's another touchy subject for some people the importance of the breeds standard weight.
00:13:33.323 --> 00:13:36.331
And my mentor told me something years ago.
00:13:36.331 --> 00:13:41.519
He said, son, weight and size are two very different things.
00:13:42.484 --> 00:13:43.908
Oh yeah and I was.
00:13:43.908 --> 00:14:07.788
I was a little confused at that, but I have come to know that that is a gospel truth and and, mandolin, I know you talked about it in some of your videos and some of your writings that we can get a breed too large, we can get them too heavy and then they lose that purpose for which the breed was created, am I not right?
00:14:07.929 --> 00:14:20.820
No, you're absolutely right, because if you focus too hard on one thing about them, it doesn't take too terribly long to have them outperforming on the one thing and underperforming elsewhere and with your breed.
00:14:21.485 --> 00:14:24.513
It specifies the very fine bone structure.
00:14:24.734 --> 00:14:25.976
Yeah, so it's gonna be easy.
00:14:27.426 --> 00:14:34.850
It's gonna be pretty easy to grow the bird too big for it to support itself if you're not careful and you just Breed for size only.
00:14:34.850 --> 00:14:35.613
Is that correct?
00:14:36.255 --> 00:14:57.726
Yes, and they can start to lose their proportions and they can start to get lazier, and then the growth rate can change too, because I noticed that there can be about three different Ways that they will grow and those three ways that they grow have an impact on what they're gonna look like and how they're gonna do so.
00:14:57.726 --> 00:15:06.284
Some of the birds that shoot up in growth for heights, once you get your hands on them you feel heavier, thicker bone, not much meat.
00:15:06.284 --> 00:15:31.932
They look wonky and gangly for a long time and it changes your harvest window Because they need so much more time to flesh back in after that growth spurt of heightened bone and it changes from like a 16 week processing to like 20, 22 weeks if they have that Tall giraffe growth rate.
00:15:31.932 --> 00:15:35.245
I call it like a turkey growth rate because heritage turkeys grow that way.
00:15:36.287 --> 00:15:41.558
Versus birds are gonna be shorter legged, more compact, with a finer, more delicate bone.
00:15:41.558 --> 00:15:48.219
They have a much easier time of retaining their flushing for the duration of growth which opens up when you're able to harvest them.
00:15:48.219 --> 00:15:57.754
And you can even start harvesting earlier if you need to so far the earliest I've done it is 14 weeks, and that was a very respectable result.
00:15:57.754 --> 00:16:06.216
It was what like three pounds and some change, and it was reflected in more flushing than bone.
00:16:07.187 --> 00:16:09.335
Well, you're very familiar with Bantams.
00:16:09.335 --> 00:16:11.804
Do you think a Bantam could be a dual purpose bird?
00:16:12.126 --> 00:16:14.139
I haven't tried it but I'm fascinated.
00:16:14.139 --> 00:16:14.985
I love Bantams.
00:16:14.985 --> 00:16:19.417
There's little chatty little boys and they have so much to say and they're perky.
00:16:19.417 --> 00:16:29.710
Bantams are fun, fun little birds and I've seen instances of some very nice dual purpose looking ones in the Bantam, shanta clear and Bantam, new Hampshire.
00:16:29.710 --> 00:16:38.977
I've seen people using silks for that, for the medicinal soup that comes from the black skin, black meat type of birds.
00:16:38.977 --> 00:16:41.230
Silks can be dual purpose.
00:16:42.145 --> 00:16:43.568
You know I had.
00:16:43.568 --> 00:17:00.736
Of course I've raised a lot of different breeds over the years, but I had Primus rock Bantams and line dot Bantams and Rhode Island red Bantams that laid an astonishing amount of eggs and they were very, very meaty carcasses as well.
00:17:01.486 --> 00:17:04.144
Kid, can you explain what a Bantam is inherently?
00:17:04.144 --> 00:17:12.646
Is it just a small, somebody selected for a smaller, progressively smaller, or did they breed out to something to get that smaller size and then select?
00:17:12.666 --> 00:17:13.209
back to it.
00:17:13.209 --> 00:17:18.250
Some naturally Bantam size breeds, seabratch for example.
00:17:18.250 --> 00:17:31.492
That was a naturally occurring Bantam and While most breeds have a large fowl and a Bantam component, not all you know Seabratch.
00:17:31.492 --> 00:17:32.796
There is no large fowl.
00:17:32.796 --> 00:17:35.230
Seabratch, there is no large fowl.
00:17:35.230 --> 00:17:36.634
Nankins, it's Bantam only.
00:17:36.634 --> 00:17:42.006
And Basically, one way to look at it is that a Bantam bird is a.
00:17:42.006 --> 00:17:51.513
If there's both, as there's large fowl and Bantam, a Bantam bird should be a Duplicate of its large fowl counterpart.
00:17:51.513 --> 00:17:53.990
Okay, there shouldn't.
00:17:53.990 --> 00:17:55.272
They should not look different.
00:17:55.292 --> 00:17:59.650
Yeah, the proportions should look the same Sort of like with miniature horses.
00:17:59.650 --> 00:18:05.192
When you look at a picture of a miniature horse, it should not look small, it should look just like the big one.
00:18:06.266 --> 00:18:09.516
Right, if there wasn't a tall person in the picture, you wouldn't know it was a miniature.
00:18:09.585 --> 00:18:11.825
Yeah, and it's proportions that do that.
00:18:13.386 --> 00:18:20.880
But as a rule of thumb, you know, bantams should be one-fifths the size, roughly, of their large fowl counterpart.
00:18:21.766 --> 00:18:24.527
Okay, but how did they get there, did I?
00:18:24.547 --> 00:18:25.431
guess my question.
00:18:25.431 --> 00:18:28.353
There there was various routes.
00:18:28.353 --> 00:18:33.155
Okay, Sometimes they would cross a large fowl into a Bantam bird.
00:18:33.155 --> 00:18:37.256
For example, I talked with Kenny Bowles one time.
00:18:37.256 --> 00:18:55.736
Kenny was a longtime breeder of New Hampshire large fowl but he is originator of New Hampshire Bantams and I asked him one time how he did that and he told me that he started out by crossing a New Hampshire large fowl with the Rhode Island red Bantam.
00:18:56.546 --> 00:18:57.228
That makes sense.
00:18:57.307 --> 00:19:01.648
Keep the color and then just just Continual selection.
00:19:01.648 --> 00:19:09.736
Okay, sure, for the smaller side bird that looked like New Hampshire's and not Rhode Island red, but that that happens on a fairly regular basis.
00:19:09.997 --> 00:19:19.244
Okay they're working on Bantam Marans and I've seen one of the the regular posters on the poultry keepers 360 Facebook page.
00:19:19.244 --> 00:19:24.884
I don't know if I can throw him under the bus, but Timothy Juergens, his shanticleer Bantams are gorgeous.
00:19:24.884 --> 00:19:27.416
I know him from the shanticleer fanciers as well.
00:19:27.517 --> 00:19:29.278
Oh, they're very tidy little birds.
00:19:29.278 --> 00:19:34.182
And then when I saw he posted for the dressing out, oh, that was beautiful.
00:19:34.925 --> 00:19:38.971
Yeah, yeah, those were really neat pictures, for sure.
00:19:39.051 --> 00:19:40.253
It makes me want some again.
00:19:41.375 --> 00:19:46.064
It makes me, you know, load that I have such small capacity here.
00:19:46.064 --> 00:19:53.323
I can hatch, I can hatch large, but I carry over small well, that's, that's one of the advantage of bannum.
00:19:54.396 --> 00:20:01.834
They don't require the amount of infrastructure To maintain a good size flock of them as it does their large-fell counterparts.
00:20:01.854 --> 00:20:02.194
All right.
00:20:02.194 --> 00:20:10.105
Well, I'm being dragged down the quail road right now, so give me, give me about December 16th, and then I might be ready for a new project.
00:20:10.737 --> 00:20:11.800
You heard it here, folks.
00:20:11.800 --> 00:20:13.365
You heard it here first.
00:20:13.365 --> 00:20:17.923
What about good egg production numbers?
00:20:17.923 --> 00:20:24.468
Madeline, you probably have more experience of this than anybody working to get their numbers, egg numbers, up.
00:20:24.468 --> 00:20:25.837
What are you thought?
00:20:25.837 --> 00:20:32.902
What would be an ideal tough in number of eggs per hen per year and breast?
00:20:33.063 --> 00:20:52.420
I like to see at least 250 and I've been monitoring my fall hatch birds from last season and they are now at the 150 mark, with another five months to go to track that full year of when they started laying.
00:20:52.420 --> 00:21:08.303
So I've got to get through winter and see how they perform there before I have the numbers, which I'm excited to see, because they've been troopers all the way until it hit 95 degrees or more than they Took a week off for that, but I still had to that trucked right through it.
00:21:08.303 --> 00:21:19.454
So those two became my favorites because when they lay during weather changes and daylight changes, if they keep going, those are the best girls.
00:21:19.454 --> 00:21:27.826
But I I think of it usually more as a weekly number and I am looking for a minimum of five eggs a week from each female.
00:21:28.776 --> 00:21:30.923
Now here's another question for you.
00:21:30.923 --> 00:21:34.285
What were your production numbers like when you first started?
00:21:35.118 --> 00:21:36.694
They were good enough to sell me on the breed.
00:21:36.694 --> 00:21:40.203
I was getting that five to six eggs a week and then I had some.
00:21:40.203 --> 00:21:41.508
Like there was one.
00:21:41.508 --> 00:21:46.755
She never did lay an egg and that threw me off because she was great otherwise.
00:21:46.755 --> 00:21:48.795
So we went ahead and paired her with dumplings.
00:21:48.795 --> 00:21:58.026
But you have to watch out for those birds that aren't productive, so that you can well, naturally they're gonna self select themselves out of the gene pool.
00:21:58.026 --> 00:22:02.586
There's that, but how long do you want her sitting in the coop taking up roost space?
00:22:03.516 --> 00:22:09.028
Yeah, not only that, eating, yeah, well, yeah it costs a lot to maintain freeloaders.
00:22:09.476 --> 00:22:15.835
So you have but you're starting to pedigree mate now and you're gonna have a tighter track on who's laying how many eggs.
00:22:15.835 --> 00:22:19.335
Yeah, I've hit that wall where I'm excited to start pair hatching.
00:22:19.497 --> 00:22:28.045
I haven't worked out the kinks yet, but I'm excited to see the data that comes from that, because it's just gonna help me make better Block decisions and get a little more detailed.
00:22:28.776 --> 00:22:33.267
Honestly, I think it will help you move further faster in the future.
00:22:34.016 --> 00:22:46.844
I think if you have a pan of four or five of your best laying females and put your best rooster in there, once you figure all that out and then either trap, nest or not, that gets into a whole nother nightmare.
00:22:46.844 --> 00:22:51.223
Or Individual pen mating, that's a whole nother.
00:22:51.223 --> 00:22:54.714
It's a lot of logistics concerns to pedigree mating.
00:22:54.795 --> 00:23:05.103
Well, while I go through that process, what I would do different in my next poultry building, since we are thinking about moving to a larger spread and expanding out on some of what we do.
00:23:05.103 --> 00:23:12.066
What I learned over this next season is going to let me know how I need to build out things differently on the second go.
00:23:12.066 --> 00:23:13.628
That'll be exciting.
00:23:14.417 --> 00:23:17.549
The experience in that area is very valuable.
00:23:17.549 --> 00:23:17.911
Teacher.
00:23:18.333 --> 00:23:25.107
Yeah, you know, what I've looked for a couple times is just a good blueprint for a poultry breeding house.
00:23:25.107 --> 00:23:29.345
It seems silly that everybody is constantly reinventing this.
00:23:29.345 --> 00:23:35.734
A lot of it is what works for you in your space, but kind of a template to work off of would be nice.
00:23:36.196 --> 00:23:40.775
Well, I recently had someone reach out and ask for if this was my barn, what would I do with it?
00:23:40.775 --> 00:23:45.757
Because he's building a brand new 20 by 30 barn and I said you know what?
00:23:45.757 --> 00:24:03.755
Let me get some graph paper and I'm going to doodle out a couple options because it fascinates me on the possible efficiency of a setup and I'm not able to go out and build it right now, but he can, so I'm going to go ahead and do a couple of doodles and then he can let me know how it goes.
00:24:04.676 --> 00:24:09.708
Well, if you want to do it in miniature, you've seen what I've been building out in one bay of our two car garage.
00:24:09.708 --> 00:24:13.734
You know, I've got the quail cubby hatchers and all that.
00:24:14.757 --> 00:24:22.775
You know it can get to be at your lugging water from pin to pin, even dragging a water hose tote and feed.
00:24:22.775 --> 00:24:26.775
One of the most efficient looking setups I have ever seen.
00:24:26.775 --> 00:24:33.775
Didn't see it in person because this was back in the late 1920s, but it was designed like a wagon wheel.